Notice

The content of this website does not necessarily represent the positions, strategies or opinions of Texas A&M University or its entities.

Judges – Graduate & Professional Student Government

Judge Types

  • Topic Judge: Experts in a specific subject area who assess presentations for content, methodology, and sound conclusions.
  • Layman Judge: Scholars who evaluate presentations based on overall deliverability, communication, and presentation skills—no subject expertise required.

How It Works

  • Topic Judges must hold the same degree level as the students they judge
  • Judges are scheduled based on availability and matched to presentations in their field when possible
  • Oral sessions: 6-8 presentations | Poster sessions: 8-10 presentations
  • All judges receive a training and evaluation rubric prior to the event

Your Impact

Judges provide critical feedback that strengthens students’ research, presentation skills, and professional development. Your objective evaluation helps bridge disciplines and enriches the SRW experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can judge?

Current Texas A&M faculty, staff, graduate, and professional students, plus alumni.

How do I register?

Complete the judge registration form above. You’ll specify your expertise, preferred taxonomy, and availability.

What do I evaluate?

You’ll use a provided rubric to score presentations and offer qualitative feedback on content (Topic Judges) and/or delivery and communication (Layman Judges).